Health care resource utilization and costs in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy treated with 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, a common comorbidity of diabetes, is a neurodegenerative disorder that targets sensory, autonomic, and motor nerves frequently associated with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). PDN carries an economic burden as the result of reduced work and productivity. A recent multicenter randomized controlled trial, SENZA-PDN (NCT03228420), assessed the impact of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on pain relief. The effects of high-frequency SCS on health care resource utilization and medical costs are not known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of high-frequency (10 kHz) SCS on health care resource utilization (HRU) and medical costs in patients with PDN using data from the SENZA-PDN trial. METHODS: Participants with PDN were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either 10 kHz SCS plus conventional medical management (CMM) (SCS treatment group) or CMM alone (CMM treatment group). Patient outcomes and HRU up to the 6-month follow-up are reported here. Costs (2020 USD) for each service was estimated based on publicly available Medicare fee schedules, Medicare claims data, and literature. HRU metrics of inpatient and outpatient contacts and costs are reported as means and SDs. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to compare SCS and CMM treatment groups at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6-month follow up, the SCS arm experienced approximately half the mean rate of hospitalizations per patient compared with the CMM treatment group (0.08 vs 0.15; P = 0.066). The CMM treatment group's total health care costs per patient were approximately 51% higher compared with the SCS treatment group (equivalent to mean annual cost per patient of $9,532 vs $6,300). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the SENZA-PDN trial indicates that the addition of 10 kHz SCS therapy results in lower rates of hospitalization and consequently lower health care costs among patients with PDN compared with those receiving conventional management alone.

Lung Function Monitoring After Lung Transplantation and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

PURPOSE: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplantation and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Clinical guidelines recommend lung function monitoring to aid early identification of BOS, but real-world rates of pulmonary function testing (PFT) have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to quantify PFT rates in lung transplantation and allo-HSCT recipients. METHODS: This longitudinal retrospective study used US data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus commercial claims database (January 1, 2006-September 30, 2018) and the Medicare Limited Data Set (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2018). Study recipients had no evidence of transplantation 12 months before transplantation, which was identified by using diagnosis and procedure codes. PFTs were identified by using procedure codes. Outcomes were percentage of recipients who received ≥1 PFT in each follow-up year, including spirometry, lung diffusion capacity, lung function volume test, and plethysmography, including the average number of total and specific tests per recipient. FINDINGS: The study identified 367 commercially insured and 1776 Medicare recipients who underwent lung transplantation; 92% and 86% received ≥1 lung function test in the first year after transplantation, respectively. Among recipients observable 3 years after transplant, 85% and 83% received ≥1 PFT. Among 2187 commercially insured and 1864 Medicare recipients who underwent allo-HSCT, 44% and 36% received ≥1 lung function test in the first posttransplant year. In the third year after transplant, only 31% and 26% of observable allo-HSCT recipients underwent any PFT. IMPLICATIONS: Morbidity and mortality from BOS remain high in lung transplant and allo-HSCT recipients, but lung function testing in the first posttransplant year is not universal, with substantially lower rates among allo-HSCT recipients. Furthermore, testing rates in all cohorts declined over time. Increased and sustained monitoring could lead to earlier detection of BOS and earlier intervention and treatment.

The healthcare resource utilization and costs of chronic lung allograft dysfunction following lung transplantation in patients with commercial insurance in the United States.

AIMS: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), a common complication of lung transplantation, is the leading cause of death for lung transplant recipients. While data on lung transplant costs are available, the impact of CLAD on healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost is not well understood. The primary objective was to quantify the HRU and costs of CLAD in the US using real-world data. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective analysis was performed of commercial claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database for patients aged 18-64 who underwent lung transplantation between January 1, 2006 and September 30, 2018. Lung transplantation was identified using International Classification of Disease and Common Procedure Terminology procedure codes. Patients studied were observable for at least 12 months before and after transplantation. Patients who developed CLAD were identified using novel, diagnosis codes for incident lung disease at least one year following transplantation. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess the study's outcomes prior to and following a CLAD diagnosis. All-cause HRU and costs, the study's primary outcomes, leading up to and following CLAD diagnosis were calculated. RESULTS: Among 129 transplant patients who developed CLAD, healthcare costs were substantially higher in the year following diagnosis ($198,113), compared to the year leading to diagnosis ($85,276). Inpatient admissions were responsible for most costs in years 1 and 2 following diagnosis ($99,372 and $83,348 respectively). Drug costs were higher in the 12 months post-index, compared to the 12 months pre-index ($3,600 vs $2,527). LIMITATIONS: Claims data do not include clinical data, have limits determining loss of follow-up, and do not provide granularity to determine disease severity. Also, there is no ICD-10-CM code specific to CLAD or BOS. CONCLUSIONS: CLAD after lung transplant is associated with substantial HRU and costs. Further work is needed to develop interventions that reduce this impact.

The economic burden of NIPC and BOS following allogeneic HSCT in patients with commercial insurance in the United States.

Noninfectious pulmonary complications (NIPC) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), including bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), cause significant morbidity and mortality, but their impact on health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs is unknown. This longitudinal retrospective study quantified the economic burden of NIPC and BOS in alloHSCT patients using commercial claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database. Study patients were aged 0 to 64 years and underwent alloHSCT between 1 January 2006 and 30 September 2018, and were observable 12 months before and up to 5 years after index alloHSCT. NIPC patients were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis codes. Outcomes were mean per patient HRU (inpatient admissions, outpatient office, hospital visits, and prescription medications) and costs paid by insurers in each post-transplant year. Among 2162 alloHSCT patients, 254 developed NIPCs, and 155 were propensity score (PS)-matched to non-NIPC patients. The year following transplantation, NIPC patients had significantly higher inpatient admission rates (3.8 ± 3.2 vs non-NIPC: 2.6 ± 2.4; P < .001) and higher total costs ($567 870 vs $412 400; P = .07), reflecting higher costs for inpatient admissions ($452 475 vs $300 202; P = .06). Among those observable for more years, costs remained higher for NIPC patients, reflecting significantly higher inpatient admission rates in the first 3 years following transplant. Subanalysis of patients with diagnoses likely reflective of BOS were consistent with these findings. AlloHSCT patients who developed NIPC had higher health care resource utilization and incurred higher costs compared with alloHSCT patients who did not develop NIPC following transplant.

Insights from Real-World Analysis of Treatment Patterns in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Several nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments are available for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA)-related pain and for improving functionality; however, clinical guideline recommendations vary on their use. OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment patterns in a real-world setting versus the guideline recommendations for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with knee OA. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from the electronic health records of the Geisinger Health System between January 1, 2010, and December 2018 to identify adults with newly diagnosed knee OA who had not received previous therapy with intra-articular corticosteroids, opioids, intra-articular hyaluronic acid, or prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Eligible patients were evaluated for the mutually exclusive treatment categories after diagnosis, including prescription NSAIDs, intra-articular corticosteroids, intra-articular hyaluronic acid (specifically an intra-articular bioengineered hyaluronic acid), opioids, physical therapy, bracing, and total knee arthroplasty. These 7 treatment categories were evaluated for utilization patterns in the real-world setting. RESULTS: A total of 8776 patients with a new diagnosis of knee OA were identified; 88.2% of them received 1 of the 7 evaluated treatments. The most frequently prescribed first treatment was intra-articular corticosteroids (26%), followed by opioids (17.6%), and intra-articular bioengineered hyaluronic acid (14.9%). The most often prescribed second treatment was opioids (15.8%), followed by physical therapy (14%), NSAIDs (11.8%), and intra-articular bioengineered hyaluronic acid (9.6%). Of note, 22.9% of the patients received only 1 evaluated therapy during the study period and did not receive a second treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed knee OA indicate that prescribers are using the spectrum of the available therapies that, at times, are different from the current treatment guideline recommendations.

Prevalence and incidence of patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) encompasses a range of heart rhythm disorders leading to rapid heart rates. By virtue of its episodic nature, diagnosing PSVT is difficult and estimating incidence and prevalence on a population level is challenging. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of PSVT in the United States (US) in contemporary practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational retrospective longitudinal study using claims, enrollment, and demographic data from the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Research database (age < 65) and the Medicare Limited Data Set (age ≥ 65) from 2008 to 2016. Patients with a PSVT diagnosis code (ICD-9: 427.0; ICD-10: I47.1) on ≥2 outpatient, ≥1 emergency room, or ≥1 inpatient visit were considered as having PSVT. Patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) were excluded from the initial analysis given the potential for misclassification. Incidence was estimated by assessing diagnoses made during year 5 of continuous enrollment. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was performed by including patients with both PSVT and AF/AFL diagnoses. Period prevalence and incidence rate were estimated to be 332.9 (323.2-342.9) and 57.8 (52.8-63.3) per 100 000 individuals, respectively, when excluding patients with AF/AFL. Projected to the 2018 US Census, prevalence and incidence are 1.26 million (1.21-1.30 million) and 188,981 (172,891-206,943), respectively. Including patients with AF/AFL, the prevalence may increase to 479.7 (467.9-491.8) with an incidence of 93.4 (86.9-100.5) per 100 000 individuals or a prevalence of 2.06 million (2.01-2.12 million). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 300 people in the US had PSVT with the highest rates in older and female patients.

Costs and health resource use in patients with X-linked myotubular myopathy: insights from US commercial claims.

BACKGROUND: In X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM), mutations in the MTM1 gene result in absence or dysfunction of myotubularin, a protein required for normal development, maintenance, and function of skeletal muscle. Extreme muscle weakness results in severe respiratory failure that is fatal for approximately half of XLMTM-affected children by age 18 months. Most surviving patients require invasive mechanical ventilation, feeding tubes, and wheelchairs for mobility, due to profoundly impaired motor function. Little is known about the costs of care for this rare disease. Currently, there are no approved therapies for XLMTM. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the direct medical costs and health care resource utilization (HRU) incurred by XLMTM patients and paid by commercial insurers. METHODS: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted using the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus commercial database of adjudicated claims for more than 140 million individuals with commercial insurance coverage in the United States. An algorithm based on demographic information, diagnosis and procedure codes, and medications was used to identify XLMTM patients younger than aged 2 years during the study period from January 1, 2006, through September 30, 2018. All-cause direct medical costs and HRU during each month were calculated. Costs were grouped as inpatient hospital admissions (including the intensive care unit or neonatal intensive care unit [NICU]); emergency department visits; outpatient services (outpatient hospital visits, office visits, physician/provider office visits, ambulatory surgeries and procedures, laboratory tests, and imaging tests); and prescription medications. Monthly costs and HRU over time were stratified by age and use of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: 49 patients met the study criteria. All had at least 1 inpatient hospital admission, and 36 (73%) had at least 1 NICU stay. All patients received ventilation at some time during the study period, including 40 (82%) treated with invasive ventilation. Mean monthly per patient direct medical costs were highest in the first year of life ($74,831), including costs for inpatient admissions ($69,025), outpatient services ($5,266), and prescription medication ($540). Mean monthly costs were lower in the second, third, and fourth years of life ($23,207, $13,044, and $9,440, respectively). When annualized, these all-cause monthly medical costs totaled $897,978 per patient in the first year of life and nearly $1.5 million total for patients who survived the first 4 years of life. Costs were consistently highest when patients were receiving invasive ventilation and lowest when they were not receiving ventilation (i.e., before they started on ventilator support). CONCLUSIONS: This direct health care cost and HRU analysis demonstrates the substantial economic burden associated with XLMTM. Costs are highest in the first year of life and are particularly significant for patients receiving invasive ventilation. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Audentes Therapeutics, an Astellas Company, and was conducted by PRECISIONheor with funding from Audentes Therapeutics, an Astellas Company. Slocomb is an employee of Audentes Therapeutics, an Astellas Company; James was an employee at the time of the study. Sacks, Healey, and Cyr are employees of PRECISIONheor. Graham participated in the medical/scientific advisory board for Audentes as part of a clinical trial design for XLMTM but declares no vested interest or holdings that would represent a conflict of interest. Beggs received consulting fees from Audentes Therapeutics, for work on this study, and has received grants from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Audentes Therapeutics, Dynacure SAS, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, along with personal fees from Asklepios Biopharmaceutical, Inc., Ballard Biologics, Biogen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, GLG, Guidepoint Global, and Kate Therapeutics, unrelated to this study. In addition, Beggs has a patent (Patent number: 10736945) for systemic gene replacement therapy for treatment of X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) licensed to Audentes Therapeutics.

Do natural health food stores require regulation?

AIM: To compare advice provided by health food stores (HFS) and pharmacies in relation to medical conditions and assess the need for regulation of HFS. METHODS: We assessed the advice provided by 26 health food stores (HFS) and 26 pharmacies to an individual presenting with symptoms suggestive of moderate to severe asthma who had not seen a general practitioner. RESULTS: The advice provided by the two stores differed markedly. 22/26 pharmacy staff diagnosed asthma/probable asthma, whereas only 15/26 HFS staff reached the same conclusion. 92.3% of pharmacy staff compared to 34.6% of HFS staff referred the investigator to a doctor; 5 HFS advised the investigator against seeing a doctor. A wide variety of remedies were recommended by the HFS, none of which are known to be beneficial in the treatment of asthma. CONCLUSION: HFS promoting herbal products for medical conditions should be regulated in a similar fashion to shops that dispense pharmaceutical products.